Custom-Made Benchmarking

FEV Now Minimizes Costs Even for Hybrid Transmissions

18. April 2018 | Engineering Service

FEV continues to maintain a global leadership position in benchmarking of transmissions. In the early years FEV’s transmission benchmarking was focused on 5-6 speed planetary automatic transmissions and first generation dual clutch transmissions. In 2004, FEV added hybrid transmissions to its benchmarking portfolio. With such transmissions, the propulsion sources were no longer exclusively in front of the transmission, but also incorporated within the transmission – a factor that made novel approaches to the determination of efficiency necessary. With the growing number of conventional and hybrid benchmark projects that encompassed all variants available globally, the results of these projects were used to define FEV scatterbands, representing the state-of-the-art for metrics such as spin losses and loaded efficiency. In 2008, FEV created a standardized level-based benchmarking structure that was enhanced over subsequent years. Over the years, FEV has developed universal transmission control units (UTCU) to enable operation of complex transmissions on test rigs. More than a decade ago, FEV equipped its transmission and powertrain test cells with battery emulation systems and since 2017, FEV has added capabilities to bypass the OEM inverter controls and directly drive electric motors benchmarking hybrid transmissions and electric driveline components. Where necessary, FEV has capabilities to reverse engineer OEM hybrid/EV controllers to test the electric machines and gain insight into the efficiency of the power electronics. In 2018, the standardized transmission benchmark series was updated to cover conventional, hybrid, and electric powertrains enabling customers to evaluate items such as shift quality, strategy, and efficiency-level data on transmissions new to the market in a cost-efficient manner.


The presence of electric machines in hybrid transmissions necessitates development of new methods for benchmarking such transmissions. Regardless of the hybrid transmission type (e.g., parallel vs. power-split) or the architecture (e.g., P0 – P4) and number of electric machines in the drivetrain, various strategies to define representative test points must be taken into consideration. Thus, the test point definition moves away from conventional items such as load, input speed, and gear ratio and shifts toward the consideration of various power flow strategies. Accordingly, not only are the efficiencies of the various gears compared, but there is also an assessment of the hybrid operating strategy related to specific driving maneuvers, e.g., EV mode, power-splitting, load point shifting, generator mode, recharging strategies, and the selection criteria in the use of specific modes.


Of utmost importance for the gain in overall efficiency using the electric components is energy regeneration which, in the FEV benchmarking process, is assessed with regard to the utilization of the kinetic energy potential and the proportion of regenerated energy – in relation to the overall cost.


From a drivability perspective, additional focus has been added on understanding the use of electric machines for automatic engine starts, launch behavior enhancement, and shift quality improvement, bearing in mind the influence of items such as SOC of the HV battery.


At the component level, the thermal management strategy and its impact on performance and drivability, are also assessed. A general consideration of the system with regard to efficiency, costs, performance, NVH, and drivability form the overall impression of a vehicle to the customer. Overall, FEV has operating data from testing on approximately 70 different conventional transmissions and upwards of 40 hybrid/EV variants. This data is stored centrally in a database and is available for the creation of FEV scatterbands that allow for specific comparisons.

FEV Benchmark Program

Standardization of the Benchmarking Program

FEV offers a level-based benchmarking process to our customers. As an example, Level 0 is related to creation of “features and specification” documents where relevant information is gathered from publications and distilled to align with the focus of specific customers. These documents typically include research on components/subcomponents and highlight their influence on the system performance.


In “Level 1” a basic level of standardized instrumentation is included to provide a cost-effective vehicle assessment in a relatively short time, focusing on high-level attributes such as fuel consumption during legislative and real-world cycles, performance, and shift quality. In “Level 2” the instrumentation from Level 1 is enhanced to include more details such that customer-specific areas of focus can be addressed. Examples of details in Level 2 include vehicle-level loss analysis, energy management, and overall operating strategies under a variety of driving maneuvers. The use of personnel with long-term experience in such measurements is critical to ensuring that the right level of detail can be included in the instrumentation plan so that results with appropriate level of accuracy can be obtained. The information obtained in Level 2 can be compared to relevant scatterbands from FEV’s database so that appropriate conclusions can be drawn. With an extensively instrumented and debugged vehicle, additional analysis and research studies can be conducted focused on understanding and solving certain problems aimed at improving the drivability, refinement, and minimizing fuel consumption of the vehicle. Such results and studies can also be tailored to customer-specific requirements to support activities such as modeling and target setting.

History of transmission benchmark at FEV

In “Level 3” FEV focuses on component-level evaluations. Such tests can be at the transmission or electric motor levels on corresponding test rigs, but can also include sub-systems such as oil pumps. Further, the component-level investigations can include “strip-friction” type measurements where the contribution of individual sub-components are documented relative to the overall system quantifying their share of the overall parasitic losses. All the information gathered in Level 2 is utilized to ensure that the component-level tests are conducted with vehicle-representative control strategies and boundary conditions (such as temperature, system pressures, etc.) to provide the most representative measurement results. As market innovations happen, FEV’s benchmarking processes continuously evolve to develop appropriate techniques and methodologies. As an example, FEV has developed component test benches with capabilities to drive electromechanical actuators with our own BLDC motor control units, so that clutch and shift controls can be evaluated.
FEV is able to align our standardized benchmarking process and test protocols to meet our customers’ goals with maximized efficiency in a cost-effective manner.

Error influences of different speed measurement systems

Innovations in External Transmission Measurement – UTCU

With the increasing interconnectedness of powertrain components, it has become significantly harder to operate transmissions in isolation on component test benches. Vehicle immobilizers, complex counters, and the rise of encrypted and/or exclusive communication bus systems have complicated or suppressed the use of the simple CAN bus. The workaround of using cable harness extensions and restbus, sensor, and actuator simulations to “trick” the TCU into thinking it is in the vehicle, is disproportionately time-consuming and expensive – and, does not always achieve the intended objective. To combat this challenge, FEV has continued to develop innovative approaches. As an example, beginning in 2014 FEV developed a new overall process that ensures that the transmission on the test bench experiences exactly the same conditions and controls as in the vehicle. Part of this process is the development of the UTCU (Universal Transmission Control Unit).


Its core is a rapid prototyping control unit, to which an electronic module was added for issuing control signals. In some ways, the UTCU takes the place of the original TCU and completely replicates its control signals. CAN bus communication with the test bench can enable automated 24/7 operation on our test benches, so that a measurement with several thousand load and rotational speed points can be completed in the most time and cost-efficient manner. The UTCU has modular software in which the controls for almost all transmission types can be stored. The UTCU can be utilized either as the sole control unit or also as a subordinate actuator within a given drivetrain.


The modular approach allows not only the operation of classic solenoid actuator systems with PWM and associated carrier frequencies, but also that of BLDC actuator systems, which are used in modern transmissions.

Specialized Instrumentation

Another pillar of FEV’s global benchmarking expertise is the creativity to develop and use specialized instrumentation to meet specific project goals. FEV routinely employs torque sensors at various points in the driveline, e.g., flexplates, driveshafts, in addition to pressure measurements in clutch circuits, non-intrusive solenoid monitoring sensors (to avoid controller faults), and 3-phase power measurements in relevant portions of electrified drivetrains. Since standard instrumentation calibration approaches don’t always offer the required measurement precision, where relevant, FEV uses calibration processes that take load and temperature dependency into account, and minimize uncertainties in the measurement chain to prevent implausible measurement results.

V-P2: Vehicle Instrumentation
Torque Instrumentation BSG shaft

FEV defines a set of transducers that is consistent with the goals of a given project and associated measurement situations. In addition to the use of suitable data acquisition tools, the measurement data is processed to yield the required information depending on the required measurement scenario, online or via post-processing. The application of this determination process guarantees the use of a measurement setup that fully meets the precision requirements while avoiding unnecessary, expensive precision measurement technology that may not be absolutely necessary for achieving the defined precision required for a given project.

FEV Benchmark Series

In 2018, FEV will implement a standardized transmission benchmark series in which conventional automated transmissions as well as CVT and hybrid or DHT transmissions will be examined. The goal is to determine the efficiency and drag losses (under appropriate boundary conditions), operating strategy, shift quality and evaluation of unique and special characteristics/features (as appropriate). FEV is working to convert the detailed benchmarking services for advanced transmissions to standardized work plans, with the goal of offering our customers significant added value compared to conventional transmission benchmarking for a moderate additional price.


The program includes vehicle and test bench based measurements. For vehicle measurements, the shift quality is determined objectively and a tool-based measurement of the shift strategy is performed. In addition, the information required to optimize the UTCU is entered automatically to enable operations for test bench measurements relating to drag torque and loaded efficiency. The results are presented on an absolute basis as well as in the context of scatterbands from FEV’s global database.